<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://forums.neoteksystems.com/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>unit testing and mocking frameworks</title><link>http://forums.neoteksystems.com/blogs/john_spanos_blog/archive/2006/08/29/82.aspx</link><description>If you know me, you'll know that I am the last one to advocate unit tests :)
I have always disliked them for the simple fact, that in a real project, you have to do a TON of wire up just to get the unit test to work.&amp;nbsp; Connect to a db most of the</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.0 (Build: 60217.2664)</generator><item><title>14 facets of TypeMock.NET and Designing for Testability</title><link>http://forums.neoteksystems.com/blogs/john_spanos_blog/archive/2006/08/29/82.aspx#84</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 23:51:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">28dd0494-2916-4ead-9614-1f366a47af09:84</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><description>There has been much talk about Designing for Testability lately.Basically the argument is: &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; Should our Tests (Enabling Mock Insersions) Drive our design? or should we use tools to do it for us?Here is what 14 of are our community have to say</description></item><item><title>Eli Lopian&amp;amp;#8217;s Blog (TypeMock)  &amp;amp;raquo; Blog Archive   &amp;amp;raquo; 14 facets of TypeMock.NET and Designing for Testability</title><link>http://forums.neoteksystems.com/blogs/john_spanos_blog/archive/2006/08/29/82.aspx#85</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 10:41:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">28dd0494-2916-4ead-9614-1f366a47af09:85</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><description>PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.elilopian.com/2006/09/26/14-facets-of-typemocknet-and-designing-for-testability/"&gt;http://www.elilopian.com/2006/09/26/14-facets-of-typemocknet-and-designing-for-testability/&lt;/a&gt;</description></item><item><title>http://forums.neoteksystems.com/blogs/john_spanos_blog/archive/2006/08/29/82.aspx</title><link>http://forums.neoteksystems.com/blogs/john_spanos_blog/archive/2006/08/29/82.aspx#92</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 07:28:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">28dd0494-2916-4ead-9614-1f366a47af09:92</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><description>PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://frankthefrank.info/entry.php?id=kwws%3d22iruxpv1qhrwhnv%7cvwhpv1frp2eorjv2mrkqbvsdqrvbeorj2dufklyh2533923%3b25%3c2%3b51dvs%7b"&gt;http://frankthefrank.info/entry.php?id=kwws%3d22iruxpv1qhrwhnv%7cvwhpv1frp2eorjv2mrkqbvsdqrvbeorj2dufklyh2533923%3b25%3c2%3b51dvs%7b&lt;/a&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>